It’s refreshing to hear something about globalization and social media that’s more positive. The internet and social media is blamed for many things, like reducing face-to-face communication so it’s interesting to see an opposite view. And I agree that social media is a valuable tool for some nations. To think that Facebook helped a nation start a revolution, makes what we use Facebook for kind of trivial. So while this is a great start for preserving languages, we definitely won’t be able to save all of them. And if you were to learn an engendered language, you wouldn’t really have much use for it, because if you live in Canada and the 50 other speakers live in say South America, who would you speak to? I mean short of travelling to South America and speaking to them, there isn’t much to do with what you’ve learned. Some might argue that perhaps that energy and time should be put into learning a more common language, like Spanish or Chinese. These languages seem to be growing so rapidly that in about 50 years or so, they could become the most spoken languages around the world. I know that suggestion kind of defeats the purpose of these digital dictionaries of endangered languages but that’s basically the reality we live in now. Can we really stop that prediction just by having the ability to learn languages that are currently endangered?